fix(telos): align dashboard engineer cap to 16 (was split 10/16)#1313
Open
juliedavila wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
fix(telos): align dashboard engineer cap to 16 (was split 10/16)#1313juliedavila wants to merge 1 commit into
juliedavila wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
L73 (routing comment) and L383 (Parallel Execution summary) said "up to 10" while the description (L3) and the CRITICAL build instruction (L265) said "up to 16". The CRITICAL line governs build-time behavior, so 16 is the operative cap; this raises the two stale references to match.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Releases/v5.0.0/.claude/skills/Telos/SKILL.mdnamed two different caps for the dashboard-build engineer fan-out, and each one appeared twice:description): "up to 16 parallel engineers"CRITICALbuild instruction): "up to 16 parallel engineers"The
CRITICALdirective on L265 is the line that drives build-time behavior, and it says 16, with the description agreeing. I assume 16 as the cap you meant and lines 73/383 as leftovers from an earlier number, so this raises those two to 16. All four references now agree.If 10 was the ceiling you want here, I can flip it the other way.